AT-6666/M8900 Size Comparisons

Had a chance to compare the AT-6666 and the M8900 side by side.
M8900 is way smaller as you can see from the pictures below.
There is a lot more board inside the AT-6666 and I do like the integrated AT-6666 rear panel heatsink. A lot of metal in there but it looks difficult to cool. More fins and a fan might be more useful but there have been no reports of excessive heat on these recent models.

AT-6666 on top of the M8900

AT-6666 on top of the M8900


Mics and Radios

Mics and Radios

Handy

Handy


Mics and Radios

Mics and Radios


href=”https://dd182003.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/comparitive-size.jpg”>Side by Side M8900 on Right. The M8900 is a lot shorter than any 10/11m SSB Radio we have ever seen previously. Side by Side M8900 on Right. The M8900 is a lot shorter than any 10/11m SSB Radio we have ever seen previously.[/caption]
Side By Side

Side By Side


M8900 under the AT-6666

M8900 under the AT-6666


M8900 with the hand mic beside for comparison

M8900 with the hand mic beside for comparison


Large Speaker on the M8900

Large Speaker on the M8900


AT-6666 and Speaker

AT-6666 and Speaker


AT-6666 final section and heatsink. Not the integrated power cord. There is no power plug on the AT-6666.

AT-6666 final section and heatsink. Not the integrated power cord. There is no power plug on the AT-6666.


AT-6666 heat sink.

AT-6666 heat sink.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to AT-6666/M8900 Size Comparisons

  1. Pingback: ANYTONE 6666 - Page 7

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s